Theme: regulations

News From the Farm | Week of June 10, 2013

CSA members may be interested to know about a bill making its way through the California State Senate that would regulate CSAs for the first time.  Before getting worried, take note that the legislation became necessary because Environmental Health Departments up and down the state became aware of the existence of CSAs and realized that most of the CSAs in California do not have permits and were not regulated in any way.  Since Federal law requires that all food put into commerce must come from an “approved source,” Environmental Health Departments determined that CSAs were not approved sources and started trying to regulate some of their activities.

Luckily, CSA farmers started calling Community Alliance with Family Farmers (CAFF) and for the last two years, legislation (AB 224) has been in development with the goal of protecting CSAs from unnecessary interference. In order to do so, the bill had to define CSA, and says (slightly paraphrased), “CSA means a program under which a registered California direct marketing producer, or a group of them grow food for a group of California consumers shareholders or subscribers who pledge or contract to buy, on a prepayment basis, a portion of the crop.”  

[Read more…]

The Cost of Regulation

Kathleen Merrigan, who recently left her role as Deputy Secretary of Agriculture at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, said this week she is concerned about the negative impact the Food Safety Modernization Act could have on small- and medium-sized farms.

Merrigan made the remarks at CropLife America’s National Policy Conference in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday. She told the audience that the regulations being developed have “the potential to transform, disrupt, improve and potentially destroy some operations.”

“It’s really big,” she said. “It could really change agriculture and certain parts of our industry more than you realize.”

“No one gets a pass on food safety, but sometimes I worry about the bureaucracy not always being as creative as they might be in achieving the same level of food safety at small and medium size operations,” she said.

News from the Farm | April 8, 2013

When I first heard the term “food safety” I knew that even the term itself was a problem, representing an approach to our food that calls lettuce bathed in chlorine “safe” and lettuce with a speck of dirt on it “contaminated.”  Now, a few years later, years during which we have been trying to develop a reasonable Full Belly solution to the “food safety” demands, it is still easy to characterize “food safety” discussions using opposites and absolutes — industrialized, chemical-laden, sterile approaches to the food system on the one hand, and agrarian, biologically-based, ecological approaches to the food system on the other. 

Family farmers knew that the discussion was going to be a difficult one when it started in earnest several years ago and they saw many of the organizations that should have been their friends melting away and coming out in favor of the chlorinated-food approach. Saying that you didn’t want to bathe your food in chlorine was held to be tantamount to saying that you wanted to kill young babies with their spinach smoothies. No one wanted to be critical of “safe food.”

[Read more…]